ku # 1414 / the new snapshot # 209 ~ a beautiful picture

roadside tangle ~ in the Adirondack PARK (embiggenable) • µ4/3

wedding reception ~ (embiggenable) • µ4/3

In a recent email from a self-proclaimed "fellow photo-geezer", whose site I visit almost daily, the geezer wrote:

.... the majority of my ‘audience’ never spends more time on the images than to identify the subject matter. Sad, but true.

That observation is, arguably, "sad, but true". However, in a real sense, it is a phenomenon predicated upon the medium of photography's primary characteristic - its ability to render realistic representations of the real world - hence elevating the depicted referent, in the eyes of most viewers, as the raison d'etre for the making of a picture.

iMo, in the case of snapshots, the depicted referent is, in fact, both the reason for the making of a picture and for holding a viewer's interest in that picture. That notion, together with the fact that snapshots are the most commonly made type of pictures, accounts for the subject matter centered attitude of most viewers of pictures.

However, my "fellow photo-geezer" is not engaged in making snapshots. His picture making intentions are more concerned (or so it seems to me) with the making of pictures which exhibit an artistic sensibility. That is, iMo, pictures which are not dependent upon subject matter / the depicted referent for exhibiting artistic merit, but rather upon sensory properties - shape, line, value, color space, etc. - which are organized to create unity, balance, imbalance, movement, stasis, serenity, agitation, etc. All of which is implemented to evoke an emotional / sensory response in the eye and sensibilities of a viewer.

A response which can be, and most often is, totally independent of the depicted referent in a picture. A visual phenomenon which is capable of creating a beautiful picture even though a depicted referent is not a thing of conventional beauty.

civilized ku # 5149-51 ~ RANDYLAND

here's Randy ~ Pittsburgh, PA (embiggenable) • iPhone

a very small part of Randy's garden ~ Pittsburgh, PA (embiggenable) • iPhone

in Randy's workshop ~ Pittsburgh, PA (embiggenable) • iPhone

During my trip to Pittsburgh I stopped by to visit RANDYLAND. Just as I was picturing the building Randy pulled up in his car and stepped into the picture (by request).

Having met Randy and seen RANDYLAND I can write with complete assurance and without fear of contradiction, Randy is part crazy, part creative and part cool dude - all of which is meant as a compliment.

2018 ~ calender

Every year, for the wife, I make a calender for her as a Xmas gift. Here is this year's effort.

FYI, it's a Shutterfly 10x10 inch hardcover book with lay-flat pages. I make the calender by hand.

civilized ku # 5139 / diptych # 220 (the new snapshot) ~ there and back again

truck art ~ Southside / Pittsburgh, PA (embiggenable) • iPhone

kids~ Cherry Hill, NJ (embiggenable) • iPhone

Xmas and New Years has come and gone. Over that time I have gone to Pittsbugh, PA and on to Cherry Hill, NJ and back home again.

While I was away, I meant to post an entry or two but, one thing or another, I never found the time. However, I did manage to make approximately 40 pictures, most of which were made with the iPhone camera module.

On the subject of picture making, iPhone / µ4/3 or otherwise, this Xmas most of my gift giving centered around giving pictures (prints). Or, as I tend to think of it, preserving and giving memories. And, it is worth noting that one of the recipients of one of my pictures actually broke out in tears (of joy), a response which cemented by decision to make my primary gift giving (any and all occasions) centered around preserving and giving memories.

My ability to preserve and give memories is attributed to my adoption of iPhone picture making inasmuch as I am making a lot of pictures of people - something I did not do much of with my "real" cameras (for what reason I don't know). And, pictures of people - family, friends, et al - are the single most cherished pictures that most people possess.

What I have discovered about my people pictures is that I can not help but bring all of my picture making / processing / vision skills to the making of such pictures. Consequently, the pictures are perceived as something very special, above and beyond what they are accustomed to seeing in a "snapshot". Throw in my deckled snapshot border and somehow, a picture becomes even more special, which may be due to the fact that the retro border incites a rather instant "nostalgic" reaction / quality to the picture.

In any event, I have been absolutely delighted with the reactions I have received to my the new snapshot pictures.

the new snapshot # 143-45 ~ seriously

family in a tree

morning reading with coffee and feet

canoes and garden

Ths entry will be an attempt to explain / write about my "serious" intentions, re: the new snapshot pictures. It is not an artist statement but will undoubtedly be the basis for one.

When I first set about to make so-called snapshots with the iPhone camera module, my intent was to see what kind of picture quality the camera module was capable of and to mimic the traditional snapshot aethetic. In addition to those goals, there was a vague notion of making a statement-rattling around in my head-about the idea of people using their phones to make billions of digital-era snapshots. Hence my project name, the new snapshot.

Along the road of this experiment, I discovered that the iPhone is capable of making good quality pictures and that I slid into the snapshot aesthetic like a fish to water. And, much to my surprise, I have really enjoyed making pictures of people with an emphasis on friends and family. Low and behold, I found that making "snapshots" can be fun and rewarding.

It should go without writing (to anyone really looking at them), that I continue to make my the new snapshot pictures with the same eye and sensibilities as I have been doing with my more "serious" ku / civilized ku pictures. At first, I tried to be more casual about picture making things such as framing and other "correct" ways of doing things but I could just not get there.

Consequently, and while my the new snapshot are seemingly about what is depicted (and they are that), my intention to "sneak" in visual things like are found in my "serious" pictures. Things like interesting framing, relationships of shapes / lines, light and dark and colors, et al. BTW, it should be obvious that the traditional snapshot drugstore border, the dirt and scratches and the attenuated tonal range are all visual slight of hand elements which; 1) reinforce the idea that the pictures are "just" snapshots, and 2) thus allowing the viewers to approach the pictures in a relaxed manner-pay no attention to man behind the curtain-there are no art things here.

Eventually, I came to realize that, with the picture making capabilities of the new snapshot cameras - aka: phones, non-serious picture makers were, in fact, making much improved snapshots than were made in the snapshot camera film era. A large viewing screen which shows exactly what is in the frame, amazingly good auto exposure / white balance capabilities and nearly endless DOF (due to the small sensor) all contribute to the ease and success of making pretty damn good snapshots.

All of that written, my most interesting discovery was that snapshots are truly timeless in their appeal. Whether they are viewed the day after they were made or many years down the road, they have an immediacy, intimacy and a universality to which viewers can relate even if they have no connection to the people, places or things depicted in the pictures.

So, let me sum up by writing that I believe my the new snapshot pictures are as "serious" and "genuine" of intent as any of my so-called "serious" work. In fact, they may represent a visual culmination of sorts of everything I have seen, heard and learned about the medium of photography and its apparatus over my 50+ year involvement with making pictures.

civilized ku # 5091 / the new snapshot # 91 ~ artistic intentions

unintentional picture (embiggenable)

Sophie ~ Stone Harbor, NJ (embiggenable)

Re: my 2nd Great Awakening - the medium of photography and its apparatus.

The genesis of my recent awakening is to be found in the book, The Art of the American Snapshot ~ 1888-1978. Specifically in the following excerpt regarding the 1944 MOMA exhibition, The American Snapshot:

.... the pictures "constitute[d] the most vital, most dynamic, most interesting and worthwhile photographic exhibition ever assembled by the Museum of Modern Art" .... [P]raised as being "without artistc pretensions" and coming "nearer to achieving the stature of true art than any of the inbred preciosities in the museum's permanent collection of in any of its previous shows," the photographs were applauded as "honest, realistic, human and articulate."

When first reading these words, within the context of the snapshots presented in the book, I had absolutely no qualms accepting the idea of the pictures being "vital, dynamic, interesting, honest, realistic, human and articulate". And, I was especially taken with the notion that the pictures were made "without artistic pretensions."

The concept of making pictures "without artistic pretensions" struck a chord with me inasmuch as, for the past decade-and-a-half, I have been making pictures with artistic intentions, if not pretensions. However, that written, I do believe that those pictures are "vital, dynamic, interesting, honest, realistic, human and articulate". And, without question, many others think so as well.

All of that written, I have been acutely aware that there was a hole in the fabric of my picturing repertoire ... while my picture making was all nearly totally spontaneous, my referents were almost exclusively places and things. With very few exceptions, people as referents were not part of my artistic intentions picture making.

Consequently, I was aware that, if I wanted to create snapshots which mimiced the Traditional American Snapshot, picturing people must be the primary instigator for making snapshots. Faced with an upcoming extended family vacation at the Jersey Shore - the wife has asserted it is all about family and not so much the place - I had the opportunity to get people-based picturing into my head. Needless to write, it was not a particularly difficult paradigm to adopt. Although ....

.... try as I might, I have been unable to shed my artistic intentions picture making M.O. I am not certain that shedding it is a requirement for making snapshots - it just has to look like the pictures were made without artistic pretentions.

More on that topic to come.

the new snapshot # 52-57 ~ 70 years under my belt

Haven't been around the blog for a while because, begining last Thrsday, I have had an extended birthday week - big party last weekend with 60 friends, family and neighbors and extended stays by a few. Good time had by all.

During that time I have been making lots of the new snapshot pictures in addition to dinking beer and scotch and smoking cigars. However, life has returned to nearly "normal" so I am back in the blogging saddle once again. And, I will be working on refining my the new snapshot picture M.O.

Ever onward.

Civilized ku # 5075 / the new snapshot # 42-45 ~ hut 2,3, 4, what the hell are we fighting for

Douglas MacArthur quote ~ US Military Academy , West Point • New York

Spent yesterday afternoon at West Point (US Military Academy) watching Hugo's hockey camp exhibition game and making iPhone camera module the new snapshot pictures. All of the pictures, including civilized ku # 5075, were made with the iPhone 7 Plus camera module.

The the new snapshot pictures and civilized ku # 5075 were initially processed on the iPhone using the Snapseed app and then send to my desktop computer for final standard civilized ku / ku workflow and the new snapshot simulated Wood Camera app effects workflow.

iMo, the iPhone camera module civilized ku picture is so remarkedly close in appearance to civilized ku pictures made with my "real" cameras, I would not hesitate for a picture making second to hang it alongside of a "real" camera-made civilized ku picture. In doing so, I believe very few viewers would be able to tell them apart. And, absolutely no viewer would be able to tell them apart when viewed from a normal picture viewing distance.