# 6099-6101 / Adirondack roadside attractions (common places) • the new snapshot ~ a different kind of seeing

(embiggenable)

(embiggenable)

(embiggenable)

I used to think that photographs were "composed." This made photography sound very unexuberant, as if it was primarily a deliberate act. Such a notion suggests that a photographer stands in front of an inviting landscape, arranges a composition, and then takes the picture. And it's true that many photographers work that way. Of course, if photographs can be composed, then there must be rules of composition, such as: the subject should never be dead center. But why not? I used to think you could learn how to be a photographer by learning the rules of composition and how to use a camera. Now I think just the opposite: if you have to learn rules, then it's already too late. The elements of a design can make a photograph bearable and inoffensive, but they will not make a photograph compelling. We are compelled by photographs which, within the limits of an objectively appropriate form, manage to offer us something that touches on authentic concerns - our happiness or unhappiness, our fidelities, our modern war with perplexity. The balance between design and content must be there because design by itself is not interesting and pure content is merely assertive.” ~ John Rosenthal

RE: “The balance between design and content must be there because design by itself is not interesting and pure content is merely assertive.”

For the past few months I have been wandering about the picture making landscape in search of a picture making trope which is focused on a recurring single referent theme. That is to write, a departure from my design, aka: form, focused picture making M.O. in which any and all referents are fodder for my picture making endeavors. An endeavor in which pursuit of design / form is at the fore. Content, not so much.

ASIDE I am using the word content in the sense of the depicted referent, not in the sense, as currently fashionable in the Academic Lunatic Fringe, of “meaning” or what the picture “says”. END OF ASIDE

The difficulty I am facing in this search for a referent-focused picture making M.O. is that I find it very difficult, if not impossible, to find / see form, as it appeals to my eye and sensibilities, when I am in the referent seeking mode of picture making. That’s cuz, for all intents and purposes, referent-focused pictures are pretty much all about the referent. Form (in the classic art world sense of the word), not so much.

Which does not mean that I am incapable of making referent-focused pictures that have interesting visual characteristics which are independent of the depicted referent. What it does seem to mean to me is that I feel like I am cheating by depending upon the chosen referent for snagging and holding a viewers interest. And, perhaps the biggest challenge I face in pursuing this endeavor is getting over that feeling.

FYI, the pictures in this entry, which fall under the heading of Adirondack roadside attractions, is most likely to be the referent-focused picture making path I will follow. That’s cuz: a) the Park is bigger than the state of Vermont and there are roadside things aplenty, new and old, which can attract a wanderer’s attention, b) they have never been “cataloged”, and, c) I am pining for a gallery exhibition-in one regional gallery in particular-and this referent-focused body of work just might be like shooting fish in a barrel, re: getting the attention of regional gallery directors.

# 6095-97 / common things ~ TMI

(embiggenable)

(embiggenable)

(embiggenable)

We got tired of the sameness of the exquisiteness of the photograph . . . [referring to the exact rendition of detail which is all-revealing.] Why? Because the photograph told us everything about the facts of nature and left out the mystery. Now, however hard-headed a man may be, he cannot stand too many facts; it is easy to get a surfeit of realities, and he wants a little mystification as a relief...” ~ Henry Peach Robinson

SINCE MY FIRST MAKING OF A PHOTOGRAPH WITH THE use of a digital camera, I have been applying-during processing-vignetting to my pictures. Recently I have also been making pictures using the iPhone PORTRAIT setting in order to achieve a limited DOF. From time to time, a slight hint of overall Gaussian Blur makes an appearance in my pictures. And, overall color saturation reduction is a regular part of my image file processing.

My rationale for these post-click-of-the-shutter processing steps is predicated on my dislike of the ever-increasing-let’s call it what it is-fetish for ultra realism. That is, iMo, the quest for maximun sharpness / resolution / detail together with extreme dynamic range, micro contrast, and color saturation that give us those nice bright colors, give us the greens of summers and makes you think all the world's a sunny day, oh yeah.

Some might opine that I am wallowing in a nostalgia for the good ol' days of color film cuz, I must confess, to a certain extent I want the look and feel of my pictures to resemble the look and feel of a color C print made from color negative film. However, I want that look and feel, not cuz it mimics the analog look and feel but cuz, to my eye and sensibilities, I just flat out do not like the look and feel of the hyper-realism so evident in the current picture making environment.

In today’s digital picture making domain, iMo (and to my eye and sensibilities), so many pictures contain “too many facts”, aka: too much information (TMI). Or, if you will, a “surfeit of realities”. I would go so far as to suggest that the surfeit of realities found in hyper-real photographs far exceeds what the human eye-with a fixed glance-can see when viewing the same scene in situ. These pictures are, to a certain extent (to my eye and sensibilities), rather “clinical”. That is, while they present a surfeit of facts, they have a rather distinct lack of mystification.

ASIDE To be certain, in my application of processing techniques I always attempt to respect how the depicted referent(s) appeared to my eye in situ. END ASIDE

FYI, Robinson put forth the above quote most likely between 1869>1890. One can only imagine what he might have to say re: today’s digital surfeit of realities.

# 6084-94 / common places ~ 4 days in May

returning from Vermont ~ (embiggenable)

Cooperstown, NY ~ (embiggenable)

Cooperstown, NY ~ (embiggenable)

Cooperstown, NY ~ (embiggenable)

Cooperstown, NY ~ (embiggenable)

Canajoharie, NY ~ (embiggemable)

Canajoharie, NY ~ (embiggemable)

Burlington, VT ~ (embiggenable)

Burlington, VT ~ (embiggenable)

Canajoharie, NY ~ (embiggemable)

Cooperstown, NY ~ (embiggenable)

“One might compare the art of photography to the act of pointing. It must be true that some of us point to more interesting facts, events, circumstances, and configurations than others. [...] The talented practitioner of the new discipline would perform with a special grace, sense of timing, narrative sweep, and wit, thus endowing the act not merely with intelligence, but with that quality of formal rigor that identifies a work of art, so that we would be uncertain, when remembering the adventure of the tour, how much our pleasure and sense of enlargement had come from the things pointed to and how much from a pattern created by the pointer.” ~ John Szarkowski

WHEN I AM OUT AND ABOUT / TRAVELING I MAKE A FAIR number of pictures. Most end up in hard-cover POD photo books which are made in response to specific travel ventures.

It is in those books that appear my pictures of tourist “hot spots”-people, places, and things which are “must sees”. While I attempt to make those pictures in a manner that differ from the typical touristy pictures-what Szarkowski labels as with a quality of formal rigor that identifies a work of art. However, ultimately those pictures are primarily about the pictured referent. Re: more interesting…configurations / a pattern created by the pointer, not so much.

That written, the travel photo books are, in fact, dominated by pictures in which the pictured referents are co-opted for their potential, to my eye and sensibilities, for making photographs which illustrate more interesting visual configurations. And, it is those pictures which are the reason I make photographs.

Fortunately for me, the wife gets my more-interesting-configuration picture making M.O. That’s fortunate cuz she really appreciates the total visual representation of our travels as illustrated in the books. That’s true even though she has no memory of having seen most of things that I see and picture.

#6077-79 / the new snapshot • common places ~ magic...making something from nothing

(embiggenable)

(embiggenable)

(embiggenable)

ON MY LAST ENTRY, JOHN LINN LEFT A COMMENT THAT READ in part:

I am now involved with a camera club in our new community and will be presenting some ideas/thoughts on how we can find beauty around us that is not obvious without careful observation and visual curiosity... skills that need to be learned and internalized... skills that you are expert in and have written extensively about in the past.

Thanks for the comment. Re: “find(ing) beauty around us that is not obvious…skills that you are expert in…” in my extensive writing about find(ing) beauty around us that is not obvious I have probably been less than precise in defining / describing what it is I actually see / find / picture in the everyday world.

To wit, in fact, I rarely see beauty in the everyday world. However, what I do see is a sense of form, aka: the relationship of color, line, shape, form, and texture-the “classic” elements of art-that emerges when isolated within my imposed framing to create, at the very least, to my eye and sensibilities, a visually interesting picturing possibility. In most cases, the depicted referent, when pictured and printed, is one that most viewers would not consider to be representative of the common notion of “beauty”.

That written, I believe that the beauty to be seen and found in my pictures is the beauty perceived in a carefully crafted print (which illustrates and illuminates how I see the world). The print, in and of itself, is a “beautiful” object (or, at least, visually interesting) independent of that which is depicted.

In fact, I believe that the transformative act of appropriating everyday artifacts for use as raw material for the creation of a beautiful object-a painting, a sculpture, a photograph-is what making Art is all about. To my eye and sensibilities, that act is nearly an act of magic…in a sense, making something beautiful out of “nothing”.

# 6072-76 / everyday • common places • common things ~ on being creative

(embiggenable)

(embiggenable)

(embiggenable)

(embiggenable)

“For the first several years one struggles with the technical challenges…a learning curve and growth process that is rewarding, stimulating and self-renewing. But, eventually every photographer who sticks with it long enough arrives at a technical plateau where production of a technically good photograph is relatively easy. It is here that real photography starts and most photographers quit.” ~ Brooks Jensen

ON MY LAST ENTRY, RE: THE STUPID IDEA OF ADDING GEAR TO MAKE PHOTOGRAPHY MORE INTERESTING, Thomas Rink left a link to a site that, along similar lines, suggested “a photographer’s kit for getting out of a creative rut.”

The writer of that, iMo, cliche-d camera-club advice article wrote that “creativity is the difference between a nice photo and a NICE photo.” That statement was then followed by a description of his “photographer’s creative kit”:

“…using accessories, taking advantage of my camera’s unique menu options, trying different exposure techniques…or simply something I remember another photographer doing well.

iMo, the conflated idea that “creativity” + the application of craft / technique as a means to becoming “creative” is a thoroughly ignorant misunderstanding of the idea of true creativity as it pertains to the making of pictures. While a learned application of craft / technique employed in the making of a photograph can certainly be a significant element of a finely realized picture making vision, it is the vision itself-the manner in which a picture maker sees the world-that imparts the idea of creativity on the part of the picture maker.

iMo, in other words, a finely realized picture making vision don’t need no indiscriminately applied art sauce-employed under the rubric of “being creative”-to make it “NICE”.

iMo, true creativity in the making of pictures is simply about being creative-thinking outside the box of conventional picture making “wisdom”-about what is suitable as a subject for the making of a photograph and then going about picturing it in the unique / singular manner in which you see it.

To see something spectacular and recognize it as a photographic possibility is not making a very big leap. But to see something ordinary, something you’d see every day, and recognize it as a photographic possibility, that’s what I am interested in.” ~ Stephen Shore

#6069-71 / civiilzed ku • places ~ don't think about it

Long Branch, NJ ~ (embiggenable)

Merchantville, NJ ~ (embiggenable)

Rochester, NY ~ (embiggenable)

I spent some time pondering what I could add to the equipment mix to make…photography more interesting…” ~ written by a blithering idiot (picture making wise)

I discovered that this camera was the technical means in photography of communicating what the world looks like in a state of heightened awareness. And it’s that awareness of really looking at the everyday world with clear and focused attention that I’m interested in. “ ~ Stephen Shore

It can be written, without a zot of doubt, that a picture maker who thinks that adding to his/her equipment mix will make photography more interesting, has less than a snowball’s chance in hell of seeing what the world looks like in a state of heightened awareness much less making a picture with clear and focused attention on the everyday world. Ditto the chances of finding and fostering a unique personal way of seeing, aka: a vision.

It has been said / written a zillions times that using the 1C/1L/1Y technique is the best way to find and foster a personal vision. People are probably sick to death of hearing it. However, truer words were never spoken / written inasmuch as, the more gear one totes around, the more crap there is to get in the way of seeing

…iMo (and that of many others), there is nothing more liberating, picture making wise, than finding and using the 1 camera with the 1 lens which faithfully effortlessly records the manner in which one sees the world.

# 6066-68 / around the house•kitchen life ~ f8 and be there

(embiggenable)

early afternoon / late morning light ~ (embiggenable)

The fewer imaginative people there are the better I say because it leaves more room for me to run around in.” ~ Dominic Rouse

BEING A CREATURE OF SOME HABITUAL HABITS, I sometimes miss the forest for the trees. Like, say, today…

I get out of bed in the morning and head down to the kitchen where I sit at the kitchen island counter, drink coffee, have a morning sweet and, combobulate. Often times it is during this ritual that the morning light on the sink counter pricks my eye and sensibilities which causes me to make a picture. Such was the case this morning.

However, contrary to my normal lunch pattern / habit wherein I eat-typically a sandwich-at my computer, after I made soup and I sat at the kitchen island counter to eat. Lo and behold / surprise, surprise, my eye and sensibilities were pricked by an unexpected vision - early afternoon light on the other side of the kitchen sink from where I normally make my early morning light pictures. At nearly the same time, I also noticed, to my right, the light from a side window reflecting from the chrome of the cafe table.

That written, I have never given much thought to making pictures of afternoon light on the left side of the kitchen sink. In large part, that’s cuz there is rarely a cluster of things on that part of the counter and it is how the light, morning or afternoon, strikes a cluster of things on the counter that pricks my eye and sensibilities.

In any event, It is amazing what you can see when you keep your mind and eyes open.