# 6578-86 / travel ~ more than just a sense of place

all pictures ~ (embiggenable)

WHEN I TRAVEL IT IS ALWAYS MY INTENTION to make pictures of what I see. The challenge of doing so is to make pictures that convey a sense of place that do not look like pretty picture postcards. Actually, truth be told, that ain’t too much of a challenge cuz my vision dictates how I see what I see. And pretty picture postcard pictures just ain’t part of that program.

That written, when one is a stranger in a strange (to you) land, the temptation to make pretty postcard pictures can be a powerful force. You know…you see some thing-aka: a people, a place or a thing-that looks different than what you are used to seeing back home and wham-o, you wanna make a picture of the thing forgetting that the best picture can be more than just a picture of a thing. It’s kinda like a Pavlovian going home to mama, rules of picture making wise, by reverting to the idiotic advice that, when you are making a picture of some thing, you must simplify. That is, to eliminate any thing (or things) that “detract” a viewer’s attention from the thing you wish to picture.

Now, if your picture making intention is to make pictures for the picture viewing simple-minded, that’s good advice. However, if your intention is to make pictures that invite a viewer’s visual senses to spent a little time moseying around your picture’s real estate, providing a little more visual information, iMo, is the way to go.

Of course, the counterpoint to my way of picture making thinking is that too much information can cause a viewer to struggle with figuring out the point of a picture. To which I write, “Good.”, cuz maybe, just maybe, that consternation might just lead a viewer to the idea that the “point” of a picture is the picture itself, not just the thing that it depicts.

# 6573-77 / travels ~ there and back again

on hotel room balcony ~ Lisbon, Portugal • (embiggenable)

Lisbon, Portugal ~ (embiggenable)

Lisbon, Portugal ~ (embiggenable)

BACK HOME AND IN THE DESKTOP SADDLE once again. Sorting through the 920 pictures made in Portugal over the past 2 weeks. I’m guessing that about 1/2 or more of those pictures are dupes of one kind or another-brackets, minor framing variations, et al-of which there will most likely be 100 or so “finals”.

As mentioned, I did not bring my laptop along on my trip. I thought I could use the Squarespace app to make entries but it proved to be useless, for all practical purposes, so I gave up trying to use it. I have deleted the few entries I made with it but the pictures in them will be re-posted in new entries.

Nothing of any substance to report on the use of my new iPhone 14 PRO Max. Have not tried the new 48mp RAW picture making format.

If I had been so inclined to take the time I could have done a series in Lisbon on trolleys. The trolleys are run primarily as tourist attractions traveling through older, historic parts of the city and tourists stand in lines for hours waiting to board them. To which I said, “Not happening.”

So the wife and I took a nearly 2-hour so-called Tuk Tuk tour ride-$150US-to 4 old hilltop neighborhoods. Our driver and tour guide was great, lots of info and very friendly. She stopped at a number of locations-great views, historic buildings, interesting warren-like neighborhoods-and waited while we walked around saw the sights at each stop. Highly recommended if you are ever in the area.

Tuk Tuk driver and me ~ (embiggenable)

# 6560-07 / common things ~ work in progress

(embiggenable)

(embiggenable)

(embiggenable)

(embiggenable)

ONE OF THE SIDE BENEFITS OF SCOURING MY photo library looking for pictures for my An Adirondack Survey project has been the discovery of even more “hidden” bodies of work-unorganized / scattered about my photo library-just waiting to be put together in a coherent collection of themed work.

A case in point is the work in this entry; a body of work for which I do not yet have a title / name. The collection, at this point of discovery, includes 12 photographs, 3 of which-those presented as single photos-I made today. Not really sure how many more might be hiding in my photo library cuz more searching will need to wait until I return from Portugal (leaving this Saturday for 2 weeks).

That written, I will be on the lookout for the making of new photographs for the series.

# 6555-59 / common places • common things • kitchen sink ~ walk and see

(embiggenable)

(embiggenable)

(embiggenable)

(embiggenable)

her hair is blue ~ (embiggenable)

OVER THE PAST COUPLE DAYS THE COLOR red seems to be following me around. Or, is it just the opposite - I’m following it around?

However, point in fact, the matter is as simple as Lee Friedlander stated (modified by me), re: Joel Cohen’s comment about his pictures:

He says all kinds of nice things that I don’t recognize. Splitting Red, splintering Red. Evidently my pictures are that way, but I didn’t think, ‘I want to take a splintering red picture.’ If you’ve done the same thing for 60 55 years, you don’t think of motive very much. I just walk and see something interesting that pricks my eye and sensibilities.”

iMo, walking-aka: being there-and seeing-with mind and eyes wide open-are the prime ingredients for making good pictures.

Forget motive and simply spontaneously react-exploiting the medium’s unique-amongst-the visual-arts characteristic, aka: its intrinsic relationship with and as a cohort of the real-to something visually interesting that pricks your eye and sensibilities. In doing so, a personal vision, aka: how you see, will emerge seemingly unbidden.

Or, in other words, don'‘t think about it. Just do it. As Joel Cohen put it:

“…the obligation of the person who makes the work is to make the work, and the obligation of the people who view the work is to think about it.”

# 6551-54 / common places • common things • shallow DOF ~ it's all a blur

(embiggenable)

(embiggenable)

(embiggenable)

(embiggenable)

SINCE THE START OF MY DIGITAL CAMERA USE, I kinda missed the shallow DOF possible with most film-based cameras. That fact was exacerbated by my adoption of the micro 4/3 sensor - the smaller the sensor, the smaller the lens-projected image magnification factor = greater apparent DOF at any f-stop setting.

In order to mitagate this DOF situation, I acquired only fast, prime lenses that I used wide open to obtain some satisfactory measure of shallow DOF (when desired). Worked in some picture making situations, not so much in other situations. With the availability of full-frame digital sensors / cameras, I was sorry tempted to make the switch from µ4/3 to full-frame but, the cost / benefit ratio-duplicating my µ4/3 system-for the number of times I might want shallow DOF was most definitely out of whack. But wait….

…enter the PORTRAIT setting on the iPhone…

ASIDE this would be a good place to pause and take a deep breath if you are one of those “purists” who whine, moan, or outright scream that the iPhone PORTRAIT setting ain’t" “real” DOF. END ASIDE

…and as far as I am concerned, all is right with the world.

In any event, this entry was instigated by Mike Johnston’s request for submissions to another of his BAKER’s DOZEN call for work. The theme is pictures with “some king of blur” with the caveat that only pictures expressly made for this BD Blur event-created after 4/28/23-would be considered for prize awards. However, I believe that this caveat has since been rescinded.

Before that rescinding, I was rather annoyed cuz I have an ever expanding body of work in which blur-to one degree or another, one type or another-is the predominant visual component. That body of work is comprised of pictures made using the iPhone PORTRAIT setting. Nevertheless, within a few hours of seeing the BD Blur request for pictures, I made a few new pictures with the iPhone.

FYI, one thing I really like about the iPhone PORTRAIT setting is the fact that the apparent DOF can be adjusted / fine tuned, ad infinitum, to any desire result after the picture has been made. Try doing that with your shot-wide-open “real” digital camera.

I will be making more blur pictures before submitting one to the competition. FYI, I have only submitted to two BD competitions. Accepted to both-Cameras, and In the Museum. Be interested to know if any followers of this blog participate.