# 6735-40 / landscape • common things • rain ~ status is where you find it

all photos are embiggenable

WE HAVE HAD A 24 HOUR HEAVY RAIN EVENT which has created a number of picturesque opportunities:

• rivers are flowing at or above flood stage

• the overflow stack at the old mill is leaking

• lots of leaves have been knocked to the ground

iMo, good stuff all around.

Writing of good stuff, yesterday the wife and I drove out to a small gallery in the middle of nowhere to attend the opening reception of a 4-photographer exhibition, my son, the Cinemascapist included.

the cinamascapist + laurie (the exhibit organizer / director)

The turn out was impressive, about 40 people, considering the fact that the exhibit was in the middle of nowhere. Each participant gave a 15 minute talk about his/her work. The audience was able to ask questions and there was a great deal of interest expressed in the work and the picture makers themselves.

The experience told me that: 1. photography ain’t dead or dying, and, 2. even in the middle of nowhere there is appreciation of the medium and for those who practice it. It’s almost as if photography has some status.

# 6728-34 / common places / things • landscape • picture windows ~ fall without the screaming

(embiggenable) - as are all the pictures in this entry

WITH SOME VERY UNCHARACTERISTIC OCTOBER WEATHER-85F yesterday-I have been out and about making pictures as I go about enjoying the outdoors…54 holes of golf over the last week included.

Nothing much of note going on out there in the web-o-sphere. Although, Mr. Johnston just doesn’t seem to be able to get off the schneid, re: his idea that the status of photography is starting to decline:

“…hobbies tend to have more status the more rare or difficult or risky they are, and the fewer the number of people who have achieved some sort of mastery in that area…Maybe what's been happening to photography in the last two decades or so is that it's become something that far more people can do satisfactorily without specialized knowledge or experience, so its status is starting to decline.”

I just do not understand this status decline thing he keeps harping about. That’s cuz, in my experience, I am encountering a fair amount of evidence that, because of the vast amount of pictures that are being made, more and more people-those who have at least a modicum of aesthetic sensibility-seem to be recognizing that some pictures have more to offer than just straight off-the-cuff description. And this is especially true of those people regardless of whether or not they are “serious” or not picture makers.

In my personal experience..say…like when I am sharing my made-on-the-spot INSTAX prints-which look for all intents and purposes like mere snapshots of relatively unimportant moments-I repeatably hear comments such as, “You’ve got an eye.” Or, then there is the highest praise I hear when handing out an INSTAX prints, “This picture is going right on my refrigerator.” High praise, indeed.

I believe that this recognition of some pictures are “better” than others comes from the viewing of a zillion not so good pictures. Whether, in my experience, this recognition stems from the moment I capture or how I capture them-most likely a combination of both-is open to debate. However, I can write that when people see a picture they consider to be “special”, they do have respect for and appreciation of the medium and for the maker thereof.

So, iMo, I believe that despite that fact that far more people can satisfactorily make a lot of pictures, there are far more people making pictures that are far more than “satisfactory” than ever before. And, for those who can recognize the difference between shit and shinola ( the cream rising to the top), there is a growing / increasing appreciation for the medium and those who can make pictures with a bit of shinola.

# 6718-22 / landscape • kitchen sink • common things ~ there's no place like home

3 animals ~ (embiggenable)

Rist • the last PM ~ (embiggenable)

Rist • the last AM ~ (embiggenable)

10 AM ~ (embiggenable)

1 PM ~ (embiggenable)

BACK HOME AND WORKING WITH PS ONCE AGAIN. After nearly 7 weeks away from home and my desktop set up, I am realizing, now that I am back in the PS saddle, how much I depend upon PS to realize the full implementation of my picture making vision.

It’s not that I make any drastic / dramatic file processing procedures with PS. Rather, it’s a host of small, subtle adjustments that I feel significantly impact the look and feel of my prints. And, many of those adjustments are simply not possible to achieve with any mobile device software. I can come close enough-for web presentation-but not enough for the finished look and feel I want in my prints.

BTW, working from the iPhone RAW DNG files with the full PS software makes me really appreciate the file quality of those files. Really pretty amazing.

WARNING semi-gear stuff: Even thou I have not used it much lately, I have not completely abandoned my µ4/3 gear. However, I do haul it around on trips and shorter get-a-ways just in case I want to make a picture of something that is to far away for the iPhone reach. At which point, I mount up my 50>200mm f2.8-100>400mm eq.-Zuiko lens on my E-P5 and snap away. FYI, that large lens on the small E-P5 is truly a case of the tail wagging the dog.

That written. my E-P5 is getting rather long in the tooth and prudence dictates that it just might be time for a replacement. At this stage of my life it would most likely be my forever camera. However, replacement wise, I have been far less than enamored with the available candidates.

I have no interest in the multi-thousand dollar Olympus wunderbar cameras. That’s cuz, in large part, I don’t want a DSLR form-factor camera. I much prefer a rangefinder-like form-factor. But that’s a form-factor that the Olympus Systems camera maker has seemingly abandoned.

So imagine my surprise and delight upon discovering that a new rangefinder-like Olympus Systems camera, the E-P7, has been introduced. It is, essentially, an E-P5 upgrade or, depending on your perspective, an Oly PEN downgrade (Oly PEN minus a few that-I-don’t-care-about features).

The only problem is that it is not available in the US. However, it is showing up for order on some e-bay and used camera sites. And, at a very reasonable price - $600-700USD range. On the other hand, my son is currently in Japan for a 2 week vacation…hhmmmm.

# 6713-17 / landscape • common things ~ the end is nigh

(embiggenable)

(embiggenable)

(embiggenable)

(embiggenable)

(embiggenable)

TODAY IS THE LAST DAY AND NIGHT AT Rist Camp. Here are a few pictures made over the last couple days - my total picture output, INSTAX print wise, is hovering around the 75 print number.

One highlight of our time at Rist was just yesterday. The wife and I had planned a walk in the woods at nearby nature center-miles of trails through a variety of lake, bog / marsh / forest habits-only to discover the trails were closed due to damage from a severe rain event. So instead, we headed off to the Adirondack Experience, formerly known as the Adirondack Museum - a campus-like layout of buildings that includes a very large Art exhibition facility.

After a recent renovation, the facility is not divided into four galleries - Light, Forest, Water, Mountains. Each gallery displays Adirondack inspired paintings-they have a magnificent collection of Hudson River School masters’work-photography (primarily old-timey era), and crafts (emphasis on rustic furnishings) that fall under the gallery theme.

In any event, there was one photo by the reigning dean of Adirondack photography-albeit that he hasn’t made of photograph in 20 years. The print-most likely made on his wide format epson printer (which I helped him set up)-was approximately 3’x4’. The photograph was very much to my liking inasmuch as he primarily made photographs of the “overlooked” natural world and, in the case of this print, just screamed to my eye and sensibilities that it was a film based photograph.

That written, I was never a fan of his prints; garish, ultra contrasty and unplesantly sharp-to my eye and sensibilities-Cibachrome prints made directly from his Ektachrome 8x10 transparencies. He was enamored of the Cibachrome process because of its extreme archival properties.

All of that written, the print in question had the look and feel of a traditional C print. That is, natural color and smooth tonal transitions - a “creamy”-different from “soft”-somewhat seductive representation of the natural world. A look and feel that, by not conveying ultra-fine, extremely-sharp micro detail and contrast, exhibits, to me, a vague hint of hidden mystery that really suits my eye and sensibilities. It is a look and feel I rarely experience with the viewing of ultra-everything - detail, resolution / sharpness, dynamic range, micro-contrast - super hi-res digital-capture prints.

To be certain, I am not pining for the good ol’ days of wet darkroom, film, and C prints. I am quite happy using less than state-of-the-art sensors together with a bit of post picture capture processing with which I can simulate a film-like quality that comes through to the eye on my prints.

# 6709-12 / landscape • kitchen life • people ~ a time for reckoning?

(embiggenable)

(embiggenable)

RECENTLY A GREAT DEAL OF INK HAS BEEN SPILLED (or keyboards pounded) on TOP and VSL, re: what am I doing here? That is, the respective authors thereof seem to very concerned about their very raison d’etre, blogging wise. So I thought I might chime in on that topic but not on the comments section on those sites cuz, in both cases, the comments are fan-boy inspired I-love-everything-you-do, don’t change anything, I think you are absolutely fabulous.

Right off the top / outa the gate let me write that I do not consider either of these sites as to be about the medium of photography and its apparatus (conventions and practices, not gear).

In the case of VSL, there is never any content about the medium itself. Rather, it is all about-elevated to the level of fetish-the tools of the medium. The author seems to think that he can show us-literally, with pictures-the rather subtle difference in sensors and lenses even though he readily admits that the medium of the interweb, image display wise, pretty much obliviates those differences. Sounds to me a lot like a fools errand.

In the case of TOP, while there is a reasonable amount of content, re: the medium and its apparatus, there is an ever-increasing amount of off-topic content that strays pretty far afield from that of photography. Add to that situation the fact that the blogging platform used by TOP is absolutely unsuited to the display of photographs and what you end up with is a very compromised photography experience. But…

…iMo, the real problem with TOP-for me-is the fact that the author’s first love is the act of writing, not the act of making of photographs. In a sense, he loves to”hear” himself write. Not to mean that he does not enjoy the making of photographs but, I suspect that, if he were to be required to choose between writing or picture making, all his photo gear would be listed for sale on ebay in a NY minute.

I also believe that the author is hindered from creating a more photography-centric blog by his self-professed doubts that; a.) is photography…ending? and, b.) everything to be written about photography has already been written. 2 ideas that I believe are; a.) ridiculous and, b.) even more ridiculous.

In any event, to certain extent, I believe that both authors are old coot hidebound and therefore rather unimaginative, re: how to carry on in the blogging sphere. In a very real sense, they are trapped in a blogging paradigm of their own makings. Nevertheless, it might be interesting to follow where this all ends up inasmuch as it can be amusing to watch a potential train wreck in the making.

BONUS CONTENT - Re: is photography…ending?

(embbigenable)

(embiggenable)

FIRDAY EVENING THE WIFE AND I WENT DOWN the driveway to a restaurant / tavern for dinner only to discover that it was OPEN MIKE NIGHT. Except , quite fortunately, the hitch was that is was open mike for musicians, not for any drunk wanting to sing.

As it turned out it was a lot of fun and very entertaining. The musicians performed individually, in pairs and, eventually all jamming together. As is often the case, I had my INSTAX printer with me so I commenced to making pictures (and prints). Primarily of the musicians but also of the audience.

Just for fun, I had a waitress hand the pictures out, as I made them, to the person pictured. The point was to create a sense of confusion about where the hell these pictures were coming from. Eventually the cat was out of the bag and, when, at the end of the night, the crowd was applauding the various musicians, one musician suggested a round of applause for the guy making the pictures. The crowd turned to me and gave gave a rousing all hail and hardy applause and a few tips of the hat.

I am certain they did that only cuz, ya know, photography is…ending.

# 6698-6700 / landscape • rist camp • (a) kitchen sink ~ the gift that keeps on giving

(embiggenable)

(embiggenable)

(embiggenable)

(embiggenable)

CREATING A BLOG ENTRY WHILE HERE AT Rist Camp is rather problematic inasmuch as there are a host of distractions. There is the never-ending and ever-changing view from the porch or 9 holes of golf everyday on one of the most scenic courses in the Adirondacks. Then there is the early evening>sunset porch monkey hour spent sipping a very good whiskey and sampling a bit if a very good cigar. And, of course, I would be very remiss if I were to leave out the kitchen sink.

That written, were I to follow the lead of other so-called photo sites, I could write endlessly about the variety and finer points of whiskey (and how it is made) or the finer points of golf and my golf game (I’m low handicaper), but, as promised I won’t go there. So…

How about the idea of being in the moment, to picture or not to picture.

Recently, on a couple “true” photo sites, the idea that there is a time to photograph and time not to photograph was bantterd about. The notion that making a photograph somehow pulls the maker out of the moment and thereby diminishes the appreciation thereof. And, that constantly stopping to make a picture while talking a walk destroys the mood of simply taking a walk, not to mention annoying one’s companion.

Now I can see that that idea has some merit when considering a “serious” amateur picture maker who totes around a camera bag full of lenses, filters, et al and stops to “work” a scene, maybe even setting up a tripod and/or changing lenses. However, when it comes to my manner of making pictures, the idea has a very much not so much application.

To wit, even in my “real” camera days I-like many others-was a proponent of and practitioner of the 1 camera / 1 lens brigade. The camera was set up to be essentially, lift to the eye, point, shoot. Add to that efficiency the fact that I rarely “work” a scene and now that I am picture making within the iPhone brigade, I have time aplenty to savor/ be in the moment.

However, iMo, if one encounters a moment to be savored, appreciated, or to “be in”, not making of picture of a time-slice of that moment-in the most efficient mentally / emotionally non-invasive manner possible-is a missed opportunity. That is, an opportunity to make a picture of a moment that can be savored, appreciated, contemplated and enjoyed in an extended manner that is not possible in the actual moment.

After all, moments come and go in a….well…in a moment. Whereas a photograph can be there “forever” (within the limits of archival-ness) and is fully capable of, at least for the picture maker (and, perhaps for a companion who experienced the same moment), instigating similar feelings to those which were a part of the original being-the-moment circumstance.

So, my advice to the serious amateur, is keep it simple.That’s cuz even the most amateur-ishly made snapshot is perfectly capable of producing a recognizable facsimile of a memorable moment.

# 6688-90 / landscape • common things • kitchen sink ~ too much of a "good" thing?

Rist Camp view ~ (embiggenable)

ode to Oppenheimer ~ (embiggenable)

Rist camp sink ~ (embiggenable)

AS I PLUMB DEEPER INTO THE WORLD OF INSTAX print making, taken together with my current-while away from my desktop-loss of PS processing capabilities, I have come to an amended interpretation of the adage:

A man who knows the price of everything and the value of nothing. ~ so said Lord Darlington in Oscar Wilde’s Lady Windemere’s Fan

In my amended interpretation, a man is a picture making people (man, woman, or child) whose pictures reveal everything (max detail, resolution, dynamic range, et al) but capture the value (feeling) of nothing. That is to write, to my eye and sensibilities, such pictures project the impression of a coldly analytical, surreal / hyper real, tour de force of technical “perfection” which, once again to my eye and sensibilities, have no “soul” or visual mystery /mystique.

SO, how does INSTAX prints and loss of PS capabilities factor into my price of everything / value of nothing picture making state of mind? Simply put, looking for extreme or small detail(s) in an INSTAX print is a fool’s errand. However, in my experience, the nearly universal reaction to the viewing of such prints is an immediate connection to the feeling the picture is intended to convey. There are few or no distracting details to get in the way of that perception.

And, re: PS capabilities, now that I have been “surviving” for a couple weeks without PS-using PS Express + Snapseed for my photo editing-I have begun to question my pursuit of “perfection” - things such as creating a high degree of shadow and highlight detail, optimizing color balance by differentiating color balance between shadows and mid-tones, and the like. Processing adjustments that I try to perform with a deft / subtle hand so as to be natural looking / not obvious.

Nevertheless, the question being, do I need to tone it down? The answer to that question can only be answered when I get back to my desktop system-with a working PS-and make a few prints from “toned down” files and in order to see what’s what.

# 6685-87 / landscape • common places and things ~ happy and pissed at the same time

the view from the porch ~ (embiggenable)

(embiggenable)

(embiggenable)

SO, I’M EVER SO HAPPY TO BE BACK IN THE REAL WORLD as opposed to being in New Jersey. I consider New Jersey to be something of an aberration along the lines of:

I believe that there's an intelligence to the universe, with the exception of certain parts of New Jersey. ~ Woody Allen (as Miles Monroe in Sleeper)

That aside, I have arrived at this place with 50-60 INSTAX prints made at the Jersey Shore - fewer than I expected to make but more than I know what to do with. The solution to that situation might be found in editing.

While there is a very high number of good / interesting referent pictures, I do believe it is possible to narrow the field down to 16 (=/- a few) that can at least provide a solid hint at the feel of the event. 16 would a good number cuz 2 frames with a cluster of 8 pictures each would look good. Add a nearby bowl with the balance of the prints for easy browsing and it’s good to go.

Re: easy browsing - I can attest to the fact that people find it nearly impossible to resist the urge to browse when confronted with a pile of INSTAX prints. At the Shore, I would leave a pile of prints on a table at our house and within a few hours most of them had disappeared. They were apparently as tempting and tasty as a bowl full of candy.

On a more tragic note, I discovered that the version of PS that I have been using for years on my lap top is no longer supported by ADOBE, and, if I want to continue using a currently supported PS version I have to buy a new lap top. That’s cuz my long-in-the-tooth lap top air can not support an updated OS that will support the currently available PS versions.

This situation really pisses me off. I don’t want a bloated updated version of PS. My use of PS is centered around a handful of “simple” tools and capabilities. I don’t want no AI. I don’t want no video tools. And, “older” versions have always been more than fast enough for my needs.

In a nut shell, I can write that I really hate-yes, genuinely hate-software companies who constantly update software with “improvements”. “Improvements” designed to keep consumers on the ever-revolving treadmill of “improvements” so they can get into our coffers.