@ 7997-7999 / the new snapshot • picture window • adk vernacular ~ a touch of Autumn

all photos ~ (embiggenable)

Dumb ass photography comment culled from the web:

“I have owned cameras that were capable of producing absolutely wonderful photographs”

Really? …. a camera that produces absolutely wonderful photographs? Where can I get one?

THE AUTUMN PICTORIAL SPECTACLE IS IN FULL BLOOM and pumpkins dot the landscape like tics on a mangy bear. But, more important to me is that the Concord grape harvest is here cuz that means it is time for my annual labor-intensive–hand squeezing the pulp out of approximately 400 individual grapes (1 at a time), then straining the pits from the pulp, adding that back to a mix with the grape skins, sugar, flour, and pinch of lemon juice– grape pie making binge.

Also, even though it is not an Autumn thing, the wife scored big time; a rare 4 pack of Coca Cola hecho en mexico (made in Mexico) with pure sugar cane–see photo above.

A piece of grape pie accompanied by a bottle of pure sugar cane Coca Cola just might put me over the edge.

# 6946-52 / travel • landscape ~ picture window perfect

FOR REASONS I CAN NOT FULLY EXPLAIN MOST OF my Ireland landscape photographs were made through windows of one sort or another. The pictures do, sorta, fit into my picture windows body of work but not exactly so inasmuch as the framing of these photographs is rather different than that of most of my earlier picture windows work.

The primary difference, as I see it, is that in these pictures the window frames function, conceptually, as a frame-within-a-frame. Ya know, for those who like to see such things in a photograph, subtly emphasizing that the act of making photographs is, in effect, an act of framing select slices of the real world. On the other hand, there are those who might wonder why I did not just go outside and photograph the view without all of that “distracting crap” in the way.

Truth be told, I did not have a single thought in my picture making head, re: the concept of frame-within-a-frame, while I was making the photographs. I just liked the way all the visual elements within my imposed framing came together. iMo, and to my eye and sensibilities, it all made for a more complex / ambiguous visual presentation than that which would result, picture making vise, by just going outside and pointing a picture making device at the landscape and visually declaring it to be “beautiful”–aka: making simple pictures for simple minds.

# 6890-92 / picture windows • kitchen sink • common places-things ~ finding a new groove

all photos ~ (embiggenable)

all photos ~ (embiggenable)

SPRING HAS SPRUNG (OFFICIALLY), THE GRASS IS GREENING UP, TREES HAVE BUDS, the cat is spending more time outdoors, it looks the the Penguins are going to make the Stanley Cup playoffs and, as mentioned, the ticker is ticking in rhythm.

Photography wise, things are pretty quiet on the blog-o-sphere and consequently I have not been able to find anything worth writing about; which explains the relative radio silence here on this blog. Not that I haven’t attempted to post–over the past couple weeks I have sat down at the computer with the intent to post but each attempt has come up dry. That’s primarily due the fact that I do not want to keep on repeating my long held and oft disseminated thoughts on the medium and its apparatus.

That written, I have given thought to the idea of featuring reviews / recommended readings, re: photo books–primarily monographs–that I consider to be must-haves for the those who are interested in expanding their learnings, re: cognitive engagement, practice, and understanding about the medium and its apparatus–nothing too academic or technique-ish but rather focused on engaging work that spans the diverse practice of many picture makers / genres.

In any event, stay tuned for more frequent entries.

# 6884-88 / common places-things • portrait •travel ~ frames within a frame

all photos ~ (embiggenable)

AS MENTIONED PREVIOUSLY, I HAD A PHOTOGRAPH ACCEPTED for the On the Street exhibit in the PhotoPlace Gallery in Middlebury, VT. I was also pleased to receive an additional notice that the photograph was also chosen to be displayed for a month in a Middlebury fancy-pants coffee shop after the exhibition closes. Apparently the gallery has reached out to local venues in order to give a few photos from each exhibition additional exposure and a chance for additional sales. A nice touch.

In any event, I have submitted 6 photos–those in this entry–for consideration for an upcoming exhibition, Portals : A New Perspective–”…. photographs that explore openings, thresholds, and points of transition. Windows, doorways, mirrors, gates, archways, reflections, and frames within frames …. Whether urban or rural, interior or exterior, documentary or conceptual, show us how photography opens new ways of seeing” (from the Call for Entries).

Re: “…. how photography opens new ways of seeing” – whenever I have encountered the idea of “new ways of seeing”–photography wise–I have always been somewhat perplexed inasmuch as I am very uncertain as to what the hell that means.

Is someone trying to encourage me to adopt a new lens or camera in order to create photos that have a new visual perspective? Ya know, like a wide-angle look or a tele-photo look. Or, maybe, to try some sort of processing effect like high contrast, elevated saturation, ultra-high resolution or some other special effect?

Or, moving away from the idea of how you make photographs, technique wise, perhaps it means something as simple as pointing your picture making device at something other than the proscribed, “standard” picture making subject matter. Pay attention to the overlooked–things most people recognize but seldom really see. And, in doing so, ignore all the cliche rules for making “good” photographs; ya know, rule of thirds, “perfect” light, leading lines, simplify, and a plethora other simple-minded, clap-trap advice. In other words, strive to attain a direct, honest, and un-affected way of seeing, sometimes know as straight photography.

However, without trying to further muddy the waters, re: new ways of seeing, an important question remains; whose new seeing are we talking about–a picture maker’s or a picture viewer’s?

My answer to that question is that–writing / thinking as a maker of photographs–my intent in is two-fold; 1) to photograph the overlooked world in a manner that transcends mere documentation–that is, to see it as it is but endowing the act with that quality of formal rigor that identifies a work of art, and in doing so, 2) writing as a viewer of photographs, to encourage the viewer of my photographs to see the world in a new way–that is, to realize that the overlooked can yield up unexpected visual pleasures.

# 6744-48 / common places-things • picture windows • adirondack survey ~ magnum opus

all photos (embiggenable)

“Our artist in the Adirondacks has contrived to tell us his own story, in his graphic way, with the pencil camera, and explanation by the pen is therefore hardly necessary.” ~ excerpt from from the Saturday, September 21, 1872, edition of Appleton’s Journal featuring a wood engraving entailed “Our Artist in the Adirondacks”.

MY An Adirondack Survey / in plain sight BODY OF WORK IS APPROACHING the 650 pictures mark. Inasmuch as that number will continue to increase (where it will end, nobody knows) raises several questions. The most obvious one; whether (or not) it is time for some serious editing? Ya know, get the number down to a more “manageable” body of work. Next question; what about providence, aka: making a provision for the future? Ya know, I want the work to pass on after I pass on. After all, it is my magnum opus.

RE: editing? - simple answer: not gonna happen. While the body of work, as it currently exists, could be edited down to a more manageable number of so-called “greatest hits”, that procedure would, for all intents and purposes, dilute–if not completely destroy–the essence of what, iMo, the body of work is about; quotidian life in the Adirondack Park*. Here’s the thing ….

…. if the Adirondack Park were to be a state, it would rank as the 37th largest in the US. Within the blue line–the line drawn in blue to define its borders when the Park was created in 1892–there are 105 towns and villages with approximately 130,000 year-round residents. Yes, the Park is considered to be–and marketed as–an outdoor, natural world playground (with some nice civilized amenities throw in), but the fact is that it is also a place where the residents go about the business of paying the rent of daily living. In other words, it’s a big place with a big story, so to speak.

That written, realistically, I realize that I will most likely have to edit the collection down–for exhibition / book purposes–to approximately 300-400 photographs. FYI, that number will be determined by the number of folio edition photo books I am creating (see below).

RE: providence? - I believe that this body of work is an important collection; nothing like it has ever been undertaken. Fact is, most picture makers, tourist and accomplished locals, make, almost exclusively, pictures of the “grand” outdoors / natural landscape. If you want a picture of the Adirondack natural landscape, they are–or should be–a dime a dozen. ASIDE truth be told, I have sold–with a very hefty price tag–quite of number of that type of picture END ASIDE.

With this body of work, the major challenge for me is to find an art institution that will acquire the body of work. To that end, I will be creating 8-10 photo books (several copies of each), serial folio-edition style, each book containing 30 photographs that I will be circulating to a number of institutions.

Needless to write, I have my work cut out for me.

* An anecdote … early on I showed my first An Adirondack Survey / in plain sight photo book (70 photographs) to a couple I was just introduced to. From the art they had on the walls of their home (we were there for dinner), I judged them to be rather art conscious so I pulled out the book and they, separately, took the time to look through it, front to back. The initial comment from the wife, seconded by her husband, was, for me, quite telling …. she said that they had just returned home from a trip out side the Park and what immediately struck her about the work / book was that it expressed an overwhelming feeling of their recent drive through the Park.

Needless to write, I was delighted to know that they “got it”. And, that was confirmed when they each picked out 1 photo apiece for purchase to hang in their home.

# 6725-31 / travel • common things ~ picturing the obvious

all photos (embiggenable)

Twisted Dunes ~ my favorite golf course

I MADE IT BACK ALIVE FROM THE JERSEY SHORE only to start packing again for our 5 weeks at Rist Camp. Yesterday I sat staring at my desktop screen for the better part of 2 hours trying to come up with a topic, photography wise, to write about that I haven’t written about seemingly multiple times prior. Nothing came to mind.

That written, I’ll have lots of alone time on my hands at Rist and maybe I might just come up with a new slant on how / what I write about–rest assured, always on the topic of things photography wise–on this blog.

One thing I resolved to do while at Rist is get out and make pictures of the natural world, a referent I have been, if not actively ignoring, not pursuing with any vigor. Considering the fact I live in the largest protected area in the contiguous United States–the Adirondack “Park”, larger than Yellowstone, Yosemite, Grand Canyon, Glacier National and the Great Smokey Mountains National Parks–it seems like an obvious subject for picture making.

# 6700-03 / common places-things • picture windows • single women ~ OT New Jersey and some whiskey

all photos (embiggenable)

SPENT THE WEEKEND IN NJ FOR THE WIFE’S family holiday get together. Snuck (aka: sneaked) out with a few family members to see-2nd time for me-A COMPLETE UNKOWN. Both the drive down and back were a Dylan music fest in a car, our car. At times it felt like we were on Highway 61.

Speaking of which, Highway 61 wise, for the Holidays Dylan gifted me a copy of his hand annotated lyrics to Subterranean Homesick Blues. It was wrapped around a bottle of his Heaven Door Homesick Blues Minnesota Wheated Bourbon Whiskey. How nice of him.

FYI, here’s a review typical of his whiskeys:

Okay, so there's something just a teensy bit creepy about naming a booze brand after a Bob Dylan song with a title that's a euphemism for dying (via YouTube). Dylan does own the distillery, though, and presumably drinks the whiskey as well, and he's still knock-knock-knockin' right along in his 80th year. By all accounts, the man is quite the whiskey aficionado, so he's not going to attach his name to any old plonk. While not all celebrity-branded booze lives up to the hype, Heaven's Door Master Blender's Edition seems to be well worth the price. You can still pick up a bottle for around $100, which is not bad at all considering its striking Dylan-designed artwork.

BTW, not all of his whiskeys are $100 but, that written, I do have one (2020 edition) that was $650 off the shelf, now selling for $1,000-2,000+ a bottle. That’s why I have 2 bottles-one to drink, one (it was a gift) to hang on to for later sale as the supply dries up. The 2019 edition is currently selling in the $3,000+ range - iMo, this is a rather bizarre / ridiculous absurdity not unlike, say, buying a “bargain” priced, used Leica M4 for $7,557.29.

For the record, I do not buy whiskey as an investment. I buy it to drink it cuz, ya know, I enjoy it.

FYI, the design on the bottle is of one of his much sought after iron gates; gates he makes in his iron working studio that are put together with scrap metal he gathers while on tour.

# 6459-62 / people • foilage • sink • picture window ~ philistinish pleasures

645 medium format camera / transparency film ~ all photos ~ (embiggenable)

µ4/3 / square format

iPhone / square format

iPhone / full frame

8x10 view camera / color negative film

IN A RECENT T.O.P. ENTRY MIKE JOHNSTON prattles on (and on and on and on), re: that whatever a picture maker’s intent, meaning-wise, a viewer will make of it whatever they want, influenced by what mental / emotional makeup he/she brings to the viewing. A postulation which is totally dependent upon the idea that a photograph is capable of possessing / communicating a meaning. An idea that I-and many others-reject.

Unfortunately, iMo, the art world has, over time, reached a point wherein content-what a piece of art “says”-is valued over form-what a piece of art looks like. Me?… I subscribe to K. B. Dixon’s idea that:

“The contemporary fine-art establishment is a coalition of vested interests. They are not doing the medium any favors by relegating the idea of “visual interest” to the scrap-heap of philistinish pleasures. In a photograph, as in a painting, the photographer wants to see something he wants to look at. He does not want some ancillary item—some half-baked idea of intellectual profundity.”

Call me a philistine but I much prefer visual interest in a photograph-or any art form-over “intellectual profundity”. Or, to put in another way, I believe a photograph is meant to be seen, not “read”. I want a photograph to hit me in the eye like big pizza pie cuz that’s amore. If you wanna read, get a book.

I believe Susan Sontag got it right when she wrote:

“Photographs, which cannot themselves explain anything, are inexhaustible invitations to deduction, speculation, and fantasy… the very muteness of what is, hypothetically, comprehensible in photographs is what constitutes their attraction and provocativeness.” ~ Susan Sontag

I also think she got right again when she wrote:

“Interpretation is the revenge of the intellectual upon art. ”

That’s cuz I believe that, if you want to suck the life out of a photograph-or any piece of art-try turning it into words instead of letting it seduce and captivate your visual senses.

FYI the pictures in this entry are meant to represent the fact that there is no “magic” format for creating interesting form. No cropping was employed in processing / editing these photos - full frame only.