# 5780-82 / kitchen life•landscape (ku) ~ transmuting emperical data

(embiggenable) • iPhone

(embiggenable) • iPhone

(embiggenable) • µ4/3

(embiggenable) • µ4/3

IN A RECENT ENTRY IN WHICH I EXPRESSED THE IDEA OF writing a book, re: The Top insert # here Examples of Bad Photography Sayings / Advice, I used the phrase "purpose of making fine art" multiple times in order to clarify that my comments / options were directed to those seeking to make fine-art. In response to that usage, Markus Spring left a comment:

....This "purpose of making fine art" is definitely the most complex and difficult problem to tackle and it is much easier to define what it is not than to find a recipe how to do it.

His point is well taken. That is, if I understand the point to be what is fine art? A question which is a part of a subset to the seemingly never-ending or sufficiently answered question, what is art? Answers to those related questions span the gamut from lucid to lunatic, expressed with an economy of words or, conversely, verbose ramblings. In any event, whatever one's preference, answer wise, it is important to my book writing (still a possibility) that I introduce (in a preface) to my audience my particular art biases and beliefs, which, by association, imply what it is that I consider to be art / fine-art.

The preface would state something based upon the following:

My photography is an attempt to clarify life by illuminating reality, employing explicit description / factuality-without resorting to contrivance or glib formula-in the pursuit of creating a relationship between form and content that induces significant emotional sensations. That is, for my eye and sensibilities, in the making of a photograph I coopt the subjective possibilities of objective things as a metamorphistic device in which the mysteries in the visible can transmute emperical data in such a way that the unconscious seems to reveal itself through the real.

As for a "recipe" for the making of fine-art, Photography Division, iMo, fine-art is defined by the pursuit of character, not caricature; form, rather than adventurous novelty, and, aiding and abetting the collision of the world, the self, and art in the making of photographs. Or, something like that.

# 5779 / (in and) around the house ~ I am a formalist, always have been

(embiggenable) • iPhone

IN THE CHAPTER, Color Photographic Formalism, FROM HER BOOK the new color photography, Sally Eauclaire pretty much nailed my picture making M.O.:

...the most resourceful photographic formalists regard the complexion of the given environment as potentially articulate aesthetic material. They consider the subject and its visual essence as indivisible….these formalists perceive real objects and intervening spaces as inter-animating segments of a total visual presentation....Each photograph represents a delicately adjusted equilibrium in which a section of the world is coopted for its visual possibilities, yet delineated with the utmost specificity. The resulting image exists simultaneously as a continuous visual plane on which every space and object are interlocking pieces of a carefully constructed jigsaw puzzle and a window through which the viewer can discern navigable space and and recognizable subject matter...The most sophisticated practitioners do not work with glib formulas, but combine various tactics in response to the particular demands of each image-making situation. Most formalists now embrace complicated arrangements wherein balance is more intuitively attained and strategy less obviously revealed.

In the same chapter, Eauclaire also wrote about the then-c.1980-issue evident / prevalent as expressed by viewers and critics of what she labeled as the new color photography:

Those receptive to the subtle, sequenced impact of a multilayered image are far outnumbered by the audience who believes a good photograph must be instantly accessible. When the subject seems missing altogether, the photographer may be accused of pulling the wool over the eyes of critics, curators, and the public.

All of the above written, I present these excerpts as part of my research for background, re: a potential book-Top insert # here Worst Sayings / Pieces of Photographic Advice., aka: "glib formulas". Thing is, if I am to do a book, it will be my intent to try to not only disabuse readers of the need for "rules" but also to give them, when they are standing naked and alone (rules wise), some ideas about picture making based solely upon the "strategy" of just seeing.

# 5774-75 / kitchen sink•kitchen life ~ don't follow leaders, watch the parkin' meters

(embiggenable) • iPhone

(embiggenable) • iPhone

(embiggenable) • iPhone

OVER ON T.O.P. MICHAEL JOHNSTON HAS SETOUT TO DIVIDE HIS writing time-roughly equally-between his blog and an attempt to write a book. I wish him luck (seriously) but I am not sure that idea is going to work inasmuch as I believe that writing a book and writing for a blog are activities that each demand 100% dedication in order to be successful in either activity.

In any event, I mention the above cuz I have given thought over the years-instigated by the wife's sugestion to do so-to writing a book about photography. However, the unanswered question over that time has always been about the problem of selecting a specific photography topic to write about....topics such as how to..., art theory, history of the medium, my life experiences in making pictures, to name a few.

That written, one topic that has risen to top of the topics heap is the idea of The Top 10 Worst Pieces of Picture Making Advice. That's a likeable idea cuz one could have some fun with it. And, it is quite possible that a book on that topic has never before been written.

As an example, one such piece of bad advice that has recently been on my mind is the oft espoused adage, re: when starting out making pictures or looking for "inspiration", choose a referent that you care about and start making pictures thereof. To which I respond, "Hogwash", inasmuch as that advice is, for the purpose of making fine art, useless. Unless, of course, one desires to be little more than a documentarian. That is, making pictures wherein the pictured referent is the most important thing.

One problem with the aforementioned bad advice, iMo, is that-let me repeat, contrary to the purpose of making fine art-referent-biased pictures tend to lapse into cliche, referent or technique wise, and/or the application of art sauce in order to appeal the unwashed masses (fine art appreciation wise). Or, in other words, for the purpose of making fine art, the emphasis should not be on what you see, but rather on how you see it, aka: recognizing and utilizing one's own, unique vision.

Those 2 preceeding paragraphs written, I believe that I could expand them into a short, succinct essay, accompanied by picture examples which illustrate the point that most notablbe fine art picture makers have realized that they do not need to make pictures of what they care about in order to make visual art. Pictures that are to be appreciated primarily or solely for their imaginative, aesthetic, or thought provoking content.

The challenge for me is to determine if I could do that with 10-20 other pieces of a bad picture making advice.

# 5771-73 / landscape ~ a simple question, re: 11

(embiggenable) • iPhone

(embiggenable) • iPhone

AUTUMN FOLIAGE/COLOR IS UPON US. NOT QUITE PEAK BUT GETTING CLOSE. Along with the arrival of the color is the arrival of the so-called leaf peepers who, every man, woman, and child amongst them is armed with picture making device of one kind or another.

The collective result of all of this picture making will inevitably be, not unlike quitarist Nigel Tufnel (This Is Spinal Tap) who turned it (his amp) up to 11, fall color pictures with the saturation turned up-via apps, effects, and processing-to "11". Cuz, as you know, nothing exceeds like excess (especially in America).

Why is it that the beauty of the natural world as it actually exists is never enough for the massses? And, concurrent picture making wise, can the masses ever get enough of the "grand and glorious" of the natural world?

# 5762-66 / civilized ku+weird civilized ku•rist camp ~ grasping at straws

(embiggenable) • iPhone

(embiggenable) • iPhone

(embiggenable) • iPhone

(embiggenable) • iPhone

from a Taxidermy exhibit at the Adirondack Museum ~ (embiggenable) • iPhone

from a Taxidermy exhibit at the Adirondack Museum ~ (embiggenable) • iPhone

(embiggenable) • iPhone

(embiggenable) • iPhone

AS IS USUALLY THE CASE, AS OUR TIME AT Rist Camp is soon coming to end, Autumn color is heading toward peak color. By our departure at the end of this week color should be at or around 70-80%.

In any event, I recently came across the following call for submissions...

As an artist, I have always been intrigued with the invisible – seeking out connections between science, environment and human behavior. Yet the world has transformed exponentially. We are experiencing a change....where invisible threats have become illuminated within our global society. Through visual art, how does one explore, engage, or connect in the midst of such intensity and turmoil? Has science effected your perspective of the world, either physically or emotionally? Has your perception been altered? Do you feel you’ve gained new insight? Within loosely interpreted boundaries of Art + Science, I ask you to consider themes for this call that are a result of your shifting perspective, placing emphasis on the Heart of the Matter.

...a call which left me perplexed and struggling to decipher exactly-or even approximately-what kind of picture I might make (and the judges might like) that would illustrate "the invisible". I mean, how the hell can someone toil in a visual medium-that is, one connected to the "real" world-and make pictures of the invisible?

Which is not to write that it is not possible to make pictures of intangibles, aka: a concept. Considered the "concept" of love....I have never been able to touch love but I have felt a lover's touch-an act which can be pictured. Such a picture, when made with insight and sensitivity would stand a good chance of being perceived as an illustration / illumination of the the concept / idea of love. But, then again not always cuz, given the medium's amibguity, some-dependent upon a viewer's emotional, mental state and life experience-such a picture might be viewed as violation of personal space or, in cases, as pornography.

re: the medium's ambiguity - because the idea of what a picture might mean is primarily dependent upon what a viewer brings to the the viewing thereof, a picture is often accompanied with a caption / title. iMo, the simpler the caption / title the better, inasmuch as the medium is a visual art, not a literary art. And therein is my ptoblem with the aforementioned call for pictures...

It should be obvious to most who follow this blog that the call for pictures was issued from the within ranks of the Academic Lunatic Fringe school of picture making. A school of picture making from which, to my eye and sensibilities, I have rarely ever viewed a picture or body of work that is truly visually interesting. And, in fact, a picture that is not accompanied by a 1000 words-artpspeak + narcissistic pyschobabble-or more in an attempt to explain what the picture or body of work is about.

All of that written, I will not be answering the call for pictures. However, if anyone out there has any ideas about a suitible referent for the making of a picture about the "invisible", feel free to leave a comment.

# 5758-61 / kitchen sink (rist)•landscape•rist camp ~ the king is dead, long live the king

(embiggenable) iPhone

(embiggenable) iPhone

(embiggenable) iPhone

(embiggenable) iPhone

(embiggenable) iPhone

(embiggenable) iPhone

(embiggenable) iPhone

(embiggenable) iPhone

OVER THE PAST 2 DECADES, AS the analog photo world was being swallowed whole by the digital photo world, there arose such a clatter, I sprang from my bed to see what was the matter.

The clatter, of course, was all of the caterwauling, re: the sky is falling and/or the end of photography as we knew it. To be certain, for some-think KODAK-the sky did indeed fall. However, for the picture makers in the crowd, well...the fact is, we just kept on making pictures.

Sure, sure, you might venture, but there was a change. Sure, sure, I would venture but adding, the more things change the more they remain the same. You know what I mean...for example, be it analog or digital, a "real" camera still has aperture, shutter speed, and focusing "mechanisms". Hell, even a cameraphone module can have the same via photo apps.

And, sure, sure, the sky fell for the analog photo lab industry but virtually every "serious" picture maker I know, print making is alive and well. And, much of that output ends up 0n gallery-or the like-walls. Hell, even the wonderful, "dumpy" little diner pictured in my last entry had 5 20x30 inch prints for sale on their walls.

So, all of that written, when I encounter / read crappola like the following-via VSL/Kirk Tuck...

Photography as I practiced it ten, twenty and thirty years ago is pretty much dead now. Frequent shows of prints in galleries, and print sales to individuals seem absolutely passé....Images are now a consumable and not a physical collectible, object.... [cuz, according to Kirk] it all gets crunched down onto a screen.

...I feel like I have to respond.

With all due respect to Mr. Tuck-anyone who has made a steady, good living in the commercial photo world deserves respect-I 100% disagree with his sentiments as quoted above inasmuch as I practiced photography (commercial and personal) starting 50 years ago and, from my perspective, the making of pictures has not changed one tiny bit. That is, unless one is concerned gear and technique. But even then, the one constant-the most important concept-has not changed at all...gear and technique never made a picture, it is the picture maker who makes a picture. As you know, hopefully, cameras do not make a good / great picture any more than a typewriter (or the modern equivalent thereof) makes a good / great novel.

All of that written, I also disagree with Kirk's notion that...

Cameras have superseded photography as "the" hobby. So we long time practitioners will find it hard to give up the pursuit of gear.

I understand that sentitmnet coming from Mr. Tuck inasmuch as I believe his picture is in the dictionary along the definition of "gearhead". However, gearheads have been part of the photo world seemingly since its inception, especially so in the "serious" amateur world. Most pro picture makers, myself included, found the gear which they needed to suit their picture making and they tended to stick with it throughout their entire careers. The exception being those whose careers spanned the analog to digital eras.

All of the mentioned specifics in this entry aside, I guess my ultimate bitch is with nostalgia that is based upon specious / false / "romanizied" rememberances of things past, aka: the good old days.

# 5751-52 / landscape ~ thinking of Thomas Cole

Hudson River School homage ~ (embiggenable) • iPhone

Hudson River School homage ~ (embiggenable) • iPhone

approaching rain ~ (embiggenable) • iPhone

IT STANDS TO REASON THAT SINCE I AM at Rist Camp, within a 1/4 mile of the Hudson River-the mighty Hudson is 20 feet wide at this point-that I would make a Hudson River School like picture.

FYI, I detest the ubiquitous blazing sunset, cliche sunset picture. When confronted with a blazing sunset my standard SOP, if I am inclined to make a picture, is to turn 90-180 degrees away from the sunset and look for a more subtle expression of the event. Fortunately for me, Rist Camp is oriented to the north at about 90 degrees away fron the setting sun.

That orientation means I do not have to get out of my Adirondack chair (on the front porch) to make a Hudson River School like picture (when nature presents such a visage to my eye and sensibilities).

# 5744-50 / nocturnal • landscape • people ~ round and round it goes, where it stops nobody knows

(embiggenable) • iPhone

(embiggenable) • iPhone

(embiggenable) • iPhone

(embiggenable) • iPhone

(embiggenable) • iPhone

(embiggenable) • iPhone

(embiggenable) • iPhone

BEEN OUT AND ABOUT DOING A VARIETY OF ACTIVITIES. Hikes, night walks, evening dining cruise, tourist cabin searches, to name a few. Also revisited my favorite Adirondack glacial erratic-16 ft tall and fractured. And, I am making a surprising number of pictures.

All of that written, as I sit here making this blog entry, I continue to be rather flummoxed, re: trying to imagine a continuing direction / purpose for this blog.

The fact of the matter is, to be quite honest, I wonder about the viability of the entire photo blog milieu. It seems to me that the only photo blogs with "legs" are those which fester on gear or those that offer up a healthy dose of the cult of personality...2 topics which hold very little interest for me and certainly topics I do not wish to pursue on this blog.

One site that has been holding my interest is Cluadio Turri ~ immagini da un diario. It continues to hold my interest cuz: 1. I like the pictures, and, 2. it is all about pictures (no words). And, as I have repeatedly mentioned, for me, the medium and its apparatus is all about the pictures.

All of that written, I do enjoy reading (and writing) about the medium of photography and its apparatus (aka: apparatus = conventions and practices).