kitchen life / # 3697-97A ~ one of these things is not like the other

(embiggenable) • iPhone

(embiggenable) • iPhone

(embiggenable) • iPhone

OVER THE COURSE OF 24-36 HOURS I HAVE TWICE BEEN CONFRONTED WITH a rectangle dilemma along the lines of to square or not to square. And, after careful consideration, I have decided that squaring was the way to go in both cases.

In the case of the sky-clouds picture, I don't believe that the squaring made much of a difference whatsoever in the picture's impression / impact. However, in the case of the kitchen-life picture, the squaring most definitely causes the picture to be perceived as a "Hobson" picture rather than entirely something else / different.

In fact, I "see" the difference between the two kitchen-life picture presentations as, to my eye and sensibilities, two very distinctly different pictures.

natural world / week of... / # 3695-96 ~ adaptability

(embiggenable) • iPhone

week of 8.3.20 ~ (embiggenable) • iPhone

FYI, JUST THOUGHT I WOULD MENTION THAT most pictures posted on this blog were made on theday of the entry or within 24-48 hours thereof. However, not every picture made within that time frame gets posted. So, that being the case, I thought I would start making and posting a week of picture collage comprised of all the pictures made that week.

And, yes, I have posted a picture-as shot-made within the frame of a rectangle. That's cuz I picture what I see and that's how I saw it. Never let it be stated that I am so anal-retentive, re: the square format, that I can not adapt to a given picture making situation. After all, as I say every time I repeat the Possum Lodge Man's Pledge...

"I'm a man. I can change. If I have to. I guess."

One last thought ... here is another quote/excerpt from Sally Eauclaire. She was writing about Stephen Shore's pictures ....

"He is engaged not with any thing’s knowable identity, but with its visual mystique, its potential for being turned into a picture."

Change "He is" to "I am" and it describes my picture making MO to a T.

around the house / kitchen life / # 3692-94 ~ interanimating segments of a total visual presentation

(embiggenable) • iPhone

(embiggenable) • iPhone

(embiggenable) • iPhone

C. 1979 I WAS STRUCK BY LIGHTNING, PHOTO-EPIPHANY WISE, WHEN I was invited by the author, Sally Eauclaire, of the book, the new color photography (Abbeville Press / 1981), to be her consultant about matters technical in the making of many of the pictures in the book. What that meant for me was that for the better part of a year, she and I would meet in my studio and spread out on the floor the work of the photographers to be included in the book.

ASIDE FYI, photographers such as William Eggleston, Steven Shore, Emmet Gowin, Emmet Gowin, Joel Meyerwitz, Joel Sternfeld, Roger Mertin, Jan Groover, Michael Bishop, Harry Callahan, Eve Sonneman, Arthur Taussig, John Pfahl, Neal Slavin, William Christenberry, Len Jenshel, Mitch Epstein, and many others. END OF ASIDE

iMo, the book is a must-have for any picture maker who wishes to break away from "those who express that which is always being done...whose thinking is almost in every way in accord with everyone else...Expression [which] has become dull to those who wish to think for themselves." And, for me, the book opened both my mind and my eye to the possibilities of what was suitable visual fodder for the making of pictures.

The book is long out of print but is still in demand. Used copies are available but prices can get rather steep. Although, soft cover editions can be had quite reasonably.In any event, the book is more than just a collection of pictures inasmuch as Eauclaire's writing / critque of the work is very interesting. Although it can slide toward artspeak at times, it is well worth reading.

Consider this excerpt from Chapter 2, COLOR PHOTOGRAPHIC FORMALISM....

Unlike those contemporary painters and critics who denigrate subject matter as an adulteration of the art-about-art imperative, the most resourceful photographic formalists regard the complexion of the given environment as potenially articulate aesthetic material. They consider the subject and its visual essence as indivisible.

These formalists perceive real objects and intervening spaces as interanimating segments of a total visual presentation. They test every edge, tone, color, and texture for its expressive potential and structual funtioning. Each photograph represents a delicately adjusted equilibrium in which a section of the world is coopted for its visual possibilities, yet delineated with the utmost specificity. The resultant image exists simultaneously as a continuous visual plane on which every space and object are interlocking pieces of a carefully constructed jig-saw puzzle and a window through which the viewer can discern navigable space and recognizable subject matter....These two contexts of the image coexist in conflict, producing a visual tension that transcends pure design.

I have always considered myself to be a photographic formalist and I have never read anything better than this excerpt which describes how I "see".

kitchen life / kitchen sink / # 3689-91 ~ because the individual is different

(embiggenable) • iPhone

(embiggenable) • iPhone

(embiggenable) • iPhone

ThIS WEEKEND PAST I WAS RE-VISITING THE BOOK, ANSEL ADAMS ~IN COLOR. The pictures in the book were curated / chosen by Harry Callahan. Callahan's methodology for making his selections-from nearly 3,000 transparencies-was simple enough ... he stated that he "chose what looks good" and "selected those things that pleased me."

In any event, Adams might be spinning in his grave like a high-speed drill press inasmuch as some of Callahan's selections display evidence of the limitations, tonal range wise, of transparency film. Which is to write, some blown highlights and many blocked-up shadows. That written, those pictures which were not pushing those boundaries, are quite good. In fact, were I to invest in one Adams' print to adorn one of my walls, it would be one of his color pictures.

There are a handful of Adams quotes in the book that are worth publishing here on my blog. However, in the meantime, while reading the text in the Adams book, I remebered this spot-on quote from Harry Callahan....

"The photographs that excite me are photographs that say something in a new manner; not for the sake of being different, but ones that are different because the individual is different and the individual expresses himself. I realize that we all do express ourselves, but those who express that which is always being done are those whose thinking is almost in every way in accord with everyone else. Expression on this basis has become dull to those who wish to think for themselves." ~ Harry Callahan

around the house / simulated Polaroid / # 3688 ~ just mucking arouund

(embiggenable) • iPhone

I LIKE RUNNING AMUCK WITH MY iPHONE or any other picture making device.

"The cumulative effect of one hundred and thirty years of man’s participation in the process of running amuck with cameras was the discovery that there was amazing amount of significance, historical and otherwise, in a great many things that no one had ever seen until snapshots began forcing people to see them." ~ John Kouwenhoven

FYI, I made pictures with and without the lens flair. The one with the flair looks better to my eye and sensibilities. It fits the snapshot aesthetic rathere well.

civilized ku # 3685-87 ~ the beat (bpm) goes on

from my hospital bed ~ (embiggenable) • iPhone

from my hospital bed ~ (embiggenable) • iPhone

from my hospital bed ~ (embiggenable) • iPhone

I THOUGHT I WOULD HAVE PLENTY OF TIME TO post and entry or two while I was just sitting around in the hospital, it turned out that I never really got an extended period of time to do so. Instead there were never ending rounds-'round the clock-of EKGs (aka: ECG), drawing blood, checking vital signs, peeing in a jar and administering my new med, all of which worked in concert to rob me of an ability to concentrate on making an entry.

However, the good news is, within an hour after the taking of the first new med pill, my heart went back into sinus rhythm at a steady rate of 70bpm. And, after one dose adjustment, my heart remained at that rhythm and rate throughout my 4 day monitoring stay in the hospital. Mission accomplished.

So, it is on with the show.

Quote of the day ...

"Good photography is not about Zone Printing or any other Ansel Adams nonsense. It's just about seeing. You either see or you don't see. The rest is academic. Photography is simply a function of noticing things. Nothing more." ~ Elliott Erwitt

landscape / # 3684 ~ make it better

(embiggenable) • iPhone

WHEN COMPILING QUOTES FOR MY HIGHER LEARNING CIRRICULUM'S TEXTBOOKS, I think it important to include stupid quotes to contrast with the smart quotes ...

"One of the biggest mistakes a photographer can make is to look at the real world and cling to the vain hope that next time his film will somehow bear a closer resemblance to it...If we limit our vision to the real world, we will forever be fighting on the minus side of things, working only too make our photographs equal to what we see out there, but no better. ~ Galen Rowell

FYI, I am heading off to the hospital for 3 days of observation / sitting+laying around while I am put on a med to control my AFib. I'll have plenty of time to post entries.

simulated polaroid / the new snapshot / # 3680-83 ~ lumpishness, humanity, and universality

(embiggenable) • made from iPhone picture

(embiggenable) • made from iPhone pictures

(embiggenable) • made from iPhone pictures

(embiggenable) • made from iPhone pictures

NOT ALL OF THE QUOTES TO BE FOUND in the curriculum texts-volumes of quotes-in my ideal photography school of higher learning would be from just photographers. I have found quite a few intelligent and informative quotes from a number of other sources, especially so from authors of works of fiction.

Case in point, this bit from one of my favorite authors, Jean Shepherd....

Of all the world’s photographers, the lowliest and least honored is the simple householder who desires only to “have a camera around the house” and to “get a picture of Dolores in her graduation gown.” He lugs his primitive equipment with him on vacation trips, picnics, and family outings of all sorts. His knowledge of photography is about that of your average chipmunk. He often has trouble loading his camera, even after owning it for twenty years. Emulsion speeds, f-stops, meter readings, shutter speeds have absolutely no meaning to him, except as a language he hears spoken when, by mistake, he wanders into a real camera store to buy film instead of his usual drugstore. His product is almost always people- or possession-oriented. It rarely occurs to such a photographer to take a picture of something, say a Venetian fountain, without a loved one standing directly in front of it and smiling into the lens. What artistic results he obtains are almost inevitably accidental and totally without self-consciousness. Perhaps because of his very artlessness, and his very numbers, the nameless picture maker may in the end be the truest and most valuable recorder of our times. He never edits; he never editorializes; he just snaps away and sends the film off to be developed, all the while innocently freezing forever the plain people of his time in all their lumpishness, their humanity, and their universality. ~ Jean Shepherd

iMo, a lot of "serious" picture makers have forgotten, if they ever knew, how to have fun making pictures.