# 5497-5500 / BW oldies ~ long ago / far away

near where I lived ~ Naha, Okinawa / Japan • c.1967

on stage with James Brown ~ Naha, Okinawa / Japan • c.1967

WHILE ROOTING AROUND LOOKING FOR SOMETHING ELSE, I came across a few BW oldies. Oldie enough to have been made within the first year of my picking up a camera and starting to make pictures.

FYI, I was lucky enough to be on stage with James Brown cuz I had media credentials to do so. Just one of many experiences / oportunities throughout the years given to me as a result of my picture making capabilities.

To paraphrase Garrett Morris-as Chico Escuela on SNL-"Baseball Photography been berry, berry good to me."

civilized ku # 5260 / the new snapshot # 241 ~ one of these things is not like the other

hockey rink bathroom ~ Canton, MA. (embiggenable) • iPhone

hockey rink bathroom (v. the new snapshot) ~ Canton, MA. (embiggenable) • iPhone

It was last Wednesday in my last entry that I promised a next day entry, re: why the 2 pictures in that entry incited different reactions from a viewer thereof. That promised entry didn't happen as the result of a 4 day hockey tournament trip to the Boston area. So here is the promised entry albeit 5 days late and a dollar short.

Re: the 2 picitres in this entry - I stand by my statement in the aforementioned entry. iMo, these 2 pictures incite a different reaction in the viewers thereof. My reason for that belief:

A viewer, when confronted by the top picture on a gallery wall (or, for that matter, on a wall in my home) would typically react to the picture by searching for the picture's meaning. After all, it must have meaning inasmuch as it's hanging on a gallery wall so it must be "serious" work / ART and all ART has meaning. Therefore, the picture must be taken seriously.

Whereas the the new snapshot version of the same referent, when viewed in a photo album or even on a wall in my home, would typically be perceived as a memento of a personal experience such as something seen on a trip or a wander around town. The viewer would have a "relaxed" approach to viewing the picture. After all, it's just a snaphot. There is no meaning to be deciphered inasmuch as it's just a picture of what is depicted.

So, my point is quite simple. A viewer in a gallery assumes that a picture was made for reasons beyond what it depicts. While he/she might have an interest in what is depicted, he/she is most likely looking to see something more than that - interesting / involving visual qualities and characteristics (indepent of the depicted referent) which, when seen in a picture, transport the picture into the realm of ART.

In the case of a snapshot, a viewer looks at the thing depicted and therein is their interest, or lack thereof, in the picture. The question, why did you take a picture of that?, might arise but rarely is there a conversation, re: the pictures's ART-istic merits.

Not wishing to make a promise I might not keep, I won't promise an entry tomorrow which explains why I am making the new snapshot pictures. It's my intention to do so but .....